Qualifying L-1 Visa Job Titles: Meeting the USCIS Standard
14-15 minutes read

https://www.talvisa.com/TL;DR
The L-1 visa has two categories: L-1A for executives and managers, and L-1B for employees with specialized knowledge.
Your job title alone does not qualify you. USCIS evaluates your actual duties and responsibilities, not the title on your business card.
For L-1A, you must primarily direct the organization, a department, or an essential function, with real decision-making authority and minimal oversight.
For L-1B, you must hold knowledge that is special or advanced relative to the employer's products, services, processes, or procedures and that knowledge must be genuinely difficult to find elsewhere.
You must have worked for the same multinational employer (or a qualifying affiliate) for at least 1 continuous year within the last 3 years.
Common approved titles include VP, Director, Manager, Senior Engineer, Solutions Architect, but approval depends on the duties behind the title, not the title itself.
What Is the L-1 Visa and Who Qualifies?
The L-1 visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows multinational companies to transfer employees from a foreign office to a U.S. branch, parent, subsidiary, or affiliate.
To qualify, the employee must have worked for the company for at least 1 continuous year within the last 3 years, and must be transferring to the U.S. in either a managerial, executive, or specialized knowledge capacity.
There is no annual cap or lottery on the L-1.
As of the first half of 2025, USCIS approved approximately 92% of L-1A petitions and 93% of L-1B petitions, up from roughly 90-89% in the same period of 2024, making it one of the most reliably granted U.S. work visa categories.
It is also a dual intent visa, meaning holders can pursue permanent residency while working in the U.S. on L-1 status.
The visa has two sub-categories: L-1A for executives and managers, and L-1B for specialized knowledge employees.
Which category applies to you depends on what your role actually requires you to do day-to-day and not on which category sounds more appealing, or which one your employer prefers.
One important clarification before going further: the qualifying relationship between the foreign entity and the U.S. entity must be established before any individual petition is filed. That relationship must be one of the following: parent/subsidiary, affiliate, or branch.
A company cannot use the L-1 to bring in an employee from an unrelated foreign employer, no matter how strong the candidate's credentials.
The U.S. employer files the petition on the employee's behalf using Form I-129 (Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker). Employees cannot self-petition for an L-1.
What Is the L-1A Visa and What Job Titles Qualify?
The L-1A visa is for employees transferring to the U.S. in a managerial or executive capacity.
Qualifying L-1A job titles typically include positions like CEO, President, VP, Director, and Senior Manager, but USCIS focuses on the actual duties of the role, not the title itself.
The statute gives USCIS two distinct paths for qualifying under L-1A: executive capacity and managerial capacity. Both fall under the same visa, but they require different types of evidence.
Executive Capacity for L-1A
According to USCIS, executive capacity refers to the employee's ability to make decisions of wide latitude without much oversight. An executive must:
Direct the management of the organization or a major component or function of it
Establish goals and policies at the organizational or functional level
Exercise wide discretion in decision-making
Receive only general supervision from higher-level executives, a board of directors, or stockholders
Critically, the executive must not be performing production-level tasks as a primary duty.
USCIS expects the organization to have enough professional and managerial staff beneath the executive to handle operational work and freeing the executive to focus on direction and strategy.
Job titles that typically meet executive capacity:
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
President
Chief Operating Officer (COO)
Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
Chief Marketing Officer (CMO)
Chief Technology Officer (CTO)
Executive Vice President
Managing Director
Regional Director (when managing a major geographic division with real authority)
Vice President (when genuinely directing a major organizational component)
Managerial Capacity for L-1A
Managerial capacity covers two distinct types under USCIS definitions: personnel managers and function managers. Understanding the difference matters because the evidence requirements for each are somewhat different.
Personnel managers supervise and control the work of other professional employees. The subordinates being managed must themselves be professionals, supervisors, or other managers and not general support staff or front-line workers.
This is a commonly misunderstood requirement. A retail floor supervisor managing hourly staff will not meet the personnel manager standard, even if they carry a "Manager" title.
Function managers do not necessarily supervise other people. Instead, they manage an essential function of the organization at a high level, without direct supervision of others.
A Head of Legal who manages the legal function of a company (even without direct reports) may qualify under this path, provided the function is genuinely essential and is being managed with real authority.
In both cases, USCIS applies a "primarily" test: managerial duties must be the primary focus of the role. A manager who spends the majority of their time doing individual contributor work is likely to face an RFE.
Job titles that typically meet managerial capacity:
General Manager
Country Manager / Regional Manager
Operations Manager
Finance Manager / Controller
Human Resources Director
Marketing Director / Head of Marketing
Head of Engineering (when managing professional-level engineers)
IT Manager (when overseeing a technology function with professional subordinates)
Product Manager (at the organizational or divisional level - not a junior individual contributor role)
Legal Director / Head of Legal
Supply Chain Manager (when managing essential logistics function at a senior level)
L-1A Job Titles That Often Cause Problems
Not every "Manager" or "Director" title holds up under USCIS scrutiny. The following situations frequently result in Requests for Evidence or denials:
"Manager" titles with mostly non-professional subordinates. If the employees being managed are hourly workers, administrative assistants, or entry-level staff rather than professionals or supervisors, USCIS will question whether the managerial capacity standard is truly met.
"Director" titles without genuine decision-making authority. A title alone cannot establish executive or managerial capacity. If the person in the role routinely needs approval from above for operational decisions, the executive capacity argument weakens significantly.
Working managers who perform production-level tasks as the primary duty. USCIS looks at where the majority of time is actually spent. A technical manager who still writes code for 60% of the day may be better suited for L-1B.
Titles inflated by the foreign entity. Some companies assign senior titles in countries where it is common practice to do so regardless of actual authority level. USCIS officers are aware of this pattern and will look at the substance of the foreign role, not just what it was called.
What Is the L-1B Visa and What Job Titles Qualify?
The L-1B visa is for employees with specialized knowledge, meaning expertise in the employer's proprietary products, services, research, equipment, techniques, or management practices that is not commonly found in the broader industry.
Job titles that often qualify include Senior Engineer, Solutions Architect, Technical Consultant, and Software Developer, but the focus is always on the nature of the knowledge, not the title.
"Specialized Knowledge" for L-1B
USCIS uses a two-part framework for specialized knowledge. An employee may qualify if they have either:
Special knowledge of the petitioning organization's products, services, research, equipment, techniques, management, or procedures, or
Advanced knowledge of the petitioning organization's processes and procedures specifically
"Special" in this context means genuinely distinctive and not just expertise that any qualified professional in the field could have developed.
The knowledge must be tied to what makes the employer's operation specific: their proprietary systems, their unique internal processes, their particular technology stack, or their non-public methods.
The following factors help establish that knowledge is truly specialized:
The knowledge is proprietary to the company and not publicly available
It took significant time working within the company to develop the knowledge
The knowledge relates to products, systems, or processes not widely available in the labor market
The employee has been involved in the company's unique operations at a meaningful level, not just a peripheral one
The employer would face difficulty replacing the employee's knowledge quickly with a candidate from the open market
One point that trips up many petitions: general expertise in an industry or technology or even deep expertise, does not by itself constitute specialized knowledge under L-1B. The knowledge must be company-specific, not just field-specific.
Job Titles That Often Qualify for L-1B
The following titles frequently appear in approved L-1B petitions, particularly in technology, engineering, consulting, and research industries:
Software Engineer / Senior Software Engineer (when working with proprietary systems or internal platforms)
Solutions Architect (when designing architecture for the company's specific products or client implementations)
Systems Engineer (with proprietary infrastructure or platform knowledge)
Technical Consultant / Senior Technical Consultant
Research Scientist / Research Engineer
Data Engineer / Data Scientist (when working with proprietary data pipelines or internal analytics systems)
Product Developer / Product Specialist
Implementation Specialist (particularly for complex enterprise software)
Application Developer (with company-specific platform or codebase knowledge)
Network Engineer (with specialized knowledge of proprietary infrastructure)
Manufacturing Engineer (when expertise involves the company's unique production processes)
SAP/Oracle Consultant with deep proprietary configuration knowledge
Pharmaceutical Research Associate (with knowledge of proprietary compounds or processes)
Job Titles That Often Cause Problems for L-1B
The L-1B has historically faced higher scrutiny than L-1A, and these types of petitions are where RFEs are most common:
Generic IT or engineering roles without demonstrable proprietary knowledge. A Java developer whose skills are broadly transferable to any company will struggle to establish specialized knowledge. The question USCIS asks is: could the company hire someone from the open market to do this job quickly? If yes, the specialized knowledge argument is weak.
Roles where the knowledge is widely documented or industry-standard. Expertise in tools, platforms, or methods that are publicly documented and widely taught does not meet the specialized knowledge bar on its own.
Titles that sound technical but involve routine work. A "Senior Analyst" who performs standard financial modeling does not qualify simply because the work is sophisticated. It must be tied to processes or systems specific to the employer.
Cases where the knowledge could be transferred quickly. If the employer's argument is essentially "this person knows our system," but that system is a standard off-the-shelf product, the petition will likely face an RFE.
At Talvisa, we explicitly state to a applicants if their profile is more likely to receive an RFE.
Does Your Job Title Actually Matter for an L-1 Visa?
Your job title matters far less than your actual duties.
USCIS adjudicators are trained to look past the title and evaluate what the employee actually does on a day-to-day basis.
A "Senior Manager" who primarily performs individual contributor work may be denied, while a "Team Lead" with genuine managerial authority over professional staff may qualify.
This is the single most important thing to understand about L-1 visa job titles: the title is a signal, not a qualification.
It tells USCIS what category to look at. The petition itself, specifically the employer's support letter and organizational chart is what actually establishes eligibility.
USCIS policy guidance instructs officers to consider the totality of the role. A title that does not match the duties described in the support letter is an immediate credibility problem. Conversely, a modest title paired with a well-documented, genuinely qualifying set of duties can and does succeed.
The most common reason petitions get RFEs on the job title question is not that the role fails to qualify but it is that the petition fails to adequately describe why it qualifies. Vague job descriptions, boilerplate duty lists, and unsupported assertions are the most reliable predictor of delays.
L-1A vs L-1B: How to Determine Which Category Your Role Falls Under
The key difference between L-1A and L-1B is what the employee primarily does.
L-1A is for those who direct and manage people or functions. L-1B is for those who apply specialized, company-specific knowledge.
Generally, employees with technical titles fall under L-1B, while those with genuine oversight responsibilities over professional staff lean toward L-1A.
Notably, USCIS policy confirms that an employee does not have to transfer in the same capacity in which they worked abroad.
A manager abroad can transfer to the U.S. in a specialized knowledge role, or vice versa, as long as the U.S. role itself meets the applicable standard.
Feature | L-1A | L-1B |
|---|---|---|
Primary function | Directing/managing people or an essential function | Applying specialized, company-specific knowledge |
Supervision of others required | Yes for personnel managers; not required for function managers | Not required |
Green card pathway | EB-1C (priority worker - no PERM required) | EB-2 or EB-3 (typically requires PERM) |
Maximum initial stay (established office) | 3 years | 3 years |
Maximum initial stay (new office) | 1 year | 1 year |
Maximum total stay | 7 years | 5 years |
Typical titles | CEO, VP, Director, Manager | Engineer, Architect, Specialist, Scientist, Consultant |
Third-party worksite restrictions | None specific | Significant restrictions on supervision by third parties |
One strategic consideration worth noting: employees on L-1A have a more direct path to permanent residency through the EB-1C green card category, which does not require PERM labor certification.
For employees on L-1B, the path to a green card typically involves EB-2 or EB-3, which requires PERM, a longer and more process-intensive route. This distinction leads some employers to deliberately structure roles for L-1A qualification when the employee has long-term residency as a goal.
If a role genuinely overlaps both categories, for example, a senior technical employee who also manages a team of engineers, then work with immigration counsel to determine which classification is stronger based on how the duties break down in percentage terms.
We at Talvisa, can advise you on how to make this distinction. Schedule a call here.
How USCIS Evaluates L-1 Petitions: What Goes Beyond the Job Title
When reviewing an L-1 petition, USCIS looks at the totality of the role, including the employer support letter, the organizational chart, the employee's documented duties abroad, and the proposed U.S. duties. A strong petition does not just state a qualifying title; it builds a complete evidentiary case.
These are the elements USCIS scrutinizes most carefully:
The employer support letter (not to be confused with the employee verification letter) is the single most important document. It must describe the U.S. role in specific, concrete terms, naming the employee's responsibilities, the percentage of time spent on each category of duty, and an explicit explanation of why those duties meet the executive, managerial, or specialized knowledge standard. Vague or generic descriptions are the most common cause of RFEs.
The organizational chart establishes context. For L-1A, the chart must show where the employee sits relative to those above and below them, including the titles, names, and qualifications of any subordinates whose management forms the basis of the managerial capacity claim. For L-1B, the chart helps establish that the employee is not performing routine work that any professional in the function could perform.
Evidence of the foreign role establishes the 1-year qualifying period. This typically includes employment contracts, pay records, previous job descriptions, and a letter from the foreign employer describing what the employee did in the qualifying role abroad.
The qualifying corporate relationship must be documented separately. Stock certificates, ownership records, annual reports, and organizational charts showing the relationship between the foreign entity and the U.S. entity are all standard components.
For specialized knowledge petitions, the support letter must also address why the employee's knowledge is specifically tied to the employer's proprietary systems or operations and why that knowledge is not readily available in the general labor market.
Common L-1 Visa Job Titles by Industry
The following lists reflect job titles that have historically appeared in approved L-1A and L-1B petitions within each industry. As always, title alone does not guarantee approval, the duties must be documented to match the applicable standard.
Technology and Software
L-1A (managerial/executive):
Vice President of Engineering
Director of Technology
Head of Product
Engineering Manager
CTO
Director of Software Development
IT Director
Head of Infrastructure
L-1B (specialized knowledge):
Senior Software Engineer
Solutions Architect
Cloud Architect
Systems Engineer
Technical Lead
Senior Developer
Data Engineer
DevOps Engineer
Machine Learning Engineer
Platform Engineer
SAP Technical Consultant
Senior Implementation Specialist
Finance and Banking
L-1A (managerial/executive):
CFO
Finance Director
Head of Treasury
Regional Finance Manager
Controller
Head of Compliance
Managing Director
L-1B (specialized knowledge):
Quantitative Analyst (with proprietary model knowledge)
Risk Analyst (with firm-specific methodology)
Senior Financial Analyst working with proprietary systems
Derivatives Specialist (with firm-specific instruments)
Manufacturing and Engineering
L-1A (managerial/executive):
Plant Manager
Director of Operations
Manufacturing Director
Head of Supply Chain
VP of Production
Quality Director
L-1B (specialized knowledge):
Manufacturing Engineer (with proprietary process knowledge)
Process Engineer
Quality Engineer (with company-specific standards)
R&D Engineer
Senior Product Engineer
Industrial Engineer working with proprietary systems
Consulting and Professional Services
L-1A (managerial/executive):
Managing Director
Practice Head
Partner
Regional Director
Director of Client Services
Head of Delivery
L-1B (specialized knowledge):
Senior Consultant
Technical Consultant
Senior Business Analyst (with firm-specific methodologies)
Senior Implementation Consultant
ERP Specialist
Senior Project Lead with proprietary framework knowledge
Healthcare and Life Sciences
L-1A (managerial/executive):
Medical Director
Clinical Director
Head of Regulatory Affairs
Director of Clinical Operations
VP of Research
L-1B (specialized knowledge):
Research Scientist
Clinical Research Specialist
Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Pharmaceutical Research Associate (with proprietary compound knowledge)
Biomedical Engineer
Senior Clinical Data Manager
What the Employer's Support Letter Must Say
The employer's support letter is the most important document in an L-1 petition. It must go beyond listing a job title and describe, in detail, what the employee actually does, how their role meets the executive, managerial, or specialized knowledge standard, and why the transfer is necessary.
A strong support letter addresses all of the following in sequence:
Step 1: Describe the petitioning company and its U.S. entity. Include the nature of the business, the size of the U.S. operation, its history, and how the U.S. entity relates to the foreign entity. This sets context for everything that follows.
Step 2: Establish the qualifying corporate relationship. State explicitly that the U.S. entity is a [parent / subsidiary / affiliate / branch] of the foreign entity. This is a threshold requirement - if the relationship is not established clearly, nothing else in the letter matters.
Step 3: Describe the employee's U.S. job title and duties in specific detail. Do not use a generic duty list. Name the specific responsibilities, the percentage of time devoted to each category of duty, the reporting structure, and the decision-making authority involved. For L-1A, explain how those duties meet either the executive capacity or managerial capacity definition. For L-1B, explain specifically what knowledge the employee holds and why it is proprietary or specialized relative to the company.
Step 4: Address the organizational structure explicitly. Name the employee's supervisor (title and name), and for personnel managers, name or describe the professional-level subordinates the employee manages. Include their titles and qualifications. This is not optional for L-1A personnel manager claims.
Step 5: Describe the employee's qualifying foreign employment. Summarize what the employee did in the foreign role, the dates of that employment, and how it meets the 1-year continuous employment requirement. If the foreign role was different from the U.S. role, explain the connection.
Step 6: Explain why the employee's presence is needed in the U.S. For L-1B especially, articulate why the employee's specific knowledge is necessary for the U.S. operation and why it could not easily be sourced from the U.S. labor market.
Common Mistakes That Lead to L-1 Visa Denials or RFEs
Most L-1 RFEs come down to the same core problem: the evidence does not clearly establish that the employee's actual duties - not just their title - meet the qualifying standard.
The most common mistakes involve vague job descriptions, title inflation, and failing to distinguish the employee's role from those of their subordinates or peers.
Mistake | Why It Causes Problems | How to Fix It |
|---|---|---|
Relying on the job title alone | USCIS adjudicates on duties, not titles; a strong title with a weak duty description will be questioned | Support letter must describe specific, concrete day-to-day responsibilities with percentage time breakdowns |
Vague or generic job description | Does not establish the managerial or specialized knowledge standard with specificity | Use concrete language about what the employee actually does; avoid boilerplate |
Inflated titles from the foreign entity | Creates a credibility gap between the claimed title and actual authority level | Ensure the title reflects real duties; org chart and duty description must align |
Supervisees who are not professionals | L-1A personnel managers must supervise professionals, supervisors, or other managers - not general staff | Explicitly document the qualifications and titles of direct reports in the support letter and org chart |
Claiming specialized knowledge that is industry-wide | USCIS will deny if the knowledge is available in the general labor market | Show how the knowledge is proprietary to the employer - specific to their systems, processes, or products |
Weak or missing organizational chart | USCIS cannot assess reporting lines, authority, or staff composition | Provide a detailed chart with names, titles, qualifications, and clear reporting lines |
Insufficient foreign employment history | Must prove 1 continuous year of qualifying employment abroad | Include employment contracts, pay records, and duty descriptions from the foreign role |
Working manager performing production duties as primary role | If the employee spends most time doing individual contributor work, the managerial claim is undercut | Document that managerial duties are the primary focus; consider L-1B if the role is primarily technical |
L-1B at a third-party worksite without meeting control requirements | Strict rules apply when L-1B employees work primarily at client sites | Ensure the petitioner retains primary control and supervision; document this explicitly |
Conclusion
The L-1 visa is one of the most effective tools available for multinational companies transferring key talent to U.S. operations. With no annual cap, no lottery, and an approval rate consistently near 92%, it works, but only when the petition accurately documents how the employee's actual duties meet the qualifying standard.
Your job title sets the stage. Your duties tell the real story.
For L-1A, the question is whether you genuinely direct management or an essential organizational function - with real authority, real professional subordinates (if applicable), and real freedom from routine operational work.
For L-1B, the question is whether your knowledge of your employer's proprietary systems, products, or processes is genuinely specialized and not something that could be quickly replicated by a new hire from the open market.
If your role is on the borderline of either category, or if the duties described in your current position are difficult to document clearly against the USCIS standard, consulting with an immigration attorney before filing is worth the investment. L-1 petitions are won or lost at the evidentiary stage and a strong support letter built on accurate, specific duty documentation is the foundation of every successful one.
Frequently Asked Questions
What job titles qualify for an L-1A visa?
L-1A does not have a fixed list of qualifying titles. The visa is available to any employee whose role involves executive capacity (directing the organization or a major component with wide decision-making authority) or managerial capacity (supervising professional-level employees, or managing an essential organizational function).
Titles that commonly appear in approved L-1A petitions include CEO, President, COO, CFO, Managing Director, VP, Director, General Manager, and Regional Manager, but approval is based on duties, not the title itself.
What job titles qualify for an L-1B visa?
Any job title can appear in an L-1B petition as long as the employee holds genuine specialized knowledge: company-specific expertise in products, services, research, techniques, processes, or procedures that is not commonly found in the industry.
Commonly approved L-1B titles include Senior Software Engineer, Solutions Architect, Technical Consultant, Research Scientist, Senior Implementation Specialist, and Senior Data Engineer - again, with the emphasis on the nature of the knowledge, not the title.
Can a "Manager" title at a small company qualify for L-1A?
Yes, but small company petitions face closer scrutiny on the managerial capacity question. USCIS recognizes that small organizations may not have large teams beneath each manager.
The key factors are whether the employee genuinely manages professional-level subordinates or an essential function, and whether managing is truly the primary duty and not just one task among many operational responsibilities.
A very small company with few employees may struggle to establish managerial capacity if the "manager" is also doing the work of the people they nominally manage.
Does my job title need to be the same in the U.S. as it was abroad?
No. USCIS policy explicitly states that an employee does not have to be transferred in the same capacity in which they worked abroad.
A manager abroad can transfer to a specialized knowledge role in the U.S., or a specialized knowledge employee can transfer to a managerial role, provided the U.S. position independently meets the applicable L-1 standard. What must be consistent is the 1-year qualifying employment abroad in some qualifying capacity.
What is the difference between specialized knowledge and advanced knowledge for L-1B?
Both are accepted forms of qualifying knowledge under L-1B. Specialized knowledge refers to particular or distinctive knowledge of the employer's products, services, research, equipment, techniques, or management.
Advanced knowledge refers to knowledge of the organization's processes and procedures specifically knowledge that is more than generally found in the industry and is not easily transferable.
In practice, most successful L-1B petitions argue both angles and focus on demonstrating that the knowledge is proprietary, took time to develop within the company, and is not readily available in the open labor market.
Can I switch from L-1B to L-1A if my role changes?
Yes. If your role evolves into a managerial or executive position, your employer can file an amended L-1 petition or a new petition to reclassify you from L-1B to L-1A.
This is a meaningful strategic consideration for employees who are pursuing a green card, since L-1A leads more directly to the EB-1C priority worker category, which does not require PERM labor certification.
Timing and documentation of the role change are important; consult an immigration attorney before filing to ensure the new duties are properly captured in the amended petition.
What happens if USCIS questions my job title during the L-1 petition?
USCIS may issue a Request for Evidence (RFE) asking for more information about the nature of the role - including a more detailed duty description, a revised organizational chart, payroll records for subordinates, or additional evidence of the employee's authority.
Responding thoroughly and specifically to an RFE, with concrete documentation of actual duties, is the best path forward. An RFE is not a denial; it is a request for clarification, and many RFE responses result in approval.
Can an L-1A visa lead to a green card?
Yes, and this is one of the most significant strategic advantages of the L-1A. L-1A visa holders can pursue the EB-1C employment-based green card category, which is reserved for multinational executives and managers.
EB-1C does not require a PERM labor certification, which shortens the overall process significantly compared to EB-2 or EB-3. The employee must be in a qualifying managerial or executive role with the U.S. entity for at least 1 year before applying, and the U.S. entity must have been doing business for at least 1 year.
What is the maximum stay on an L-1 visa?
For L-1A holders (executives and managers), the maximum total stay is 7 years. Initial approval for an established U.S. office is 3 years, with extensions granted in increments of up to 2 years.
For L-1B holders (specialized knowledge), the maximum total stay is 5 years, also with an initial 3-year stay for established offices and extensions in 2-year increments. For employees transferring to establish a new U.S. office, the initial stay is limited to 1 year for both categories.
Does a sole employee or entrepreneur qualify for an L-1 visa?
Generally, no or at least, it is extremely difficult. L-1A petitions for executives or managers are scrutinized very carefully when the U.S. entity has no employees other than the beneficiary.
USCIS will question whether a manager with no one to manage or an executive with no organization to direct can genuinely meet the managerial or executive capacity standard.
For new offices especially, USCIS wants to see a credible business plan and evidence that the U.S. operation will grow to support a genuine managerial or executive role within the first year. Entrepreneurs attempting to use the L-1 for a startup scenario should work closely with an immigration attorney.
This article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration requirements vary by case and may change. For guidance specific to your situation, consult a licensed immigration attorney.
More L-1
